Global & US Headlines
Tehran Warns ‘Israel & US Bases Fair Game’ as Washington Mulls Strikes During 2-Week-Old Iran Uprising
After a Saturday call between PM Netanyahu and U.S. Secretary of State Rubio about possible U.S. military action, Iran’s parliament speaker publicly vowed on 11 Jan 2026 to hit Israel and all nearby American installations if Trump orders a strike in response to the widening protests.
Focusing Facts
- Human Rights Activists News Agency reports at least 116 protesters killed and 2,600 detained since demonstrations began 28 Dec 2025.
- Netanyahu and Rubio spoke by phone on 10 Jan 2026, prompting Israel to place forces on ‘high alert’ for any U.S. move against Iran (Reuters, Fox).
- Nation-wide internet blackout in Iran has exceeded 60 hours, according to NetBlocks on 11 Jan 2026.
Context
Iranian leaders have threatened U.S. assets before—most notably after Qasem Soleimani’s killing on 3 Jan 2020—but the last full shutdown of domestic communications paired with explicit regional retaliation threats recalls the Shah’s 1978–79 blackout tactics that ultimately failed to stem revolution. Long-term, this episode sits at the junction of two trends: (1) Iran’s cyclical, currency-driven protest waves (1999, 2009, 2019) growing progressively more radical and coordinated, and (2) external actors—especially the U.S. and Israel—periodically flirting with direct intervention yet rarely pulling the trigger since the 1953 CIA-backed coup showed how blowback can outlive short-term gains. Whether Trump’s saber-rattling becomes the first U.S. strike on Iran proper since Operation Praying Mantis in 1988 will shape Gulf security architecture for decades; but if history is guide, outside pressure can unify Iran’s fractious elite and redirect popular anger, meaning that the real century-scale significance may lie less in airstrikes and more in whether these protests, despite the blackout, coalesce into a sustained anti-theocratic movement capable of surviving without foreign rescue.
Perspectives
Right leaning U.S. media
e.g., Fox News — Presents the unrest as an opportunity for decisive American action, highlighting Netanyahu and U.S. Secretary of State Rubio weighing military intervention and amplifying Trump’s pledge to hit Iran "very, very hard" if the regime cracks down. Coverage stresses toughness and U.S.–Israel coordination while down-playing risks of escalation, matching this outlet’s hawkish editorial line and boosting Trump’s posture as a resolute leader.
Mainstream U.S. and international wire outlets
e.g., CBS News, Reuters — Emphasise the mounting death toll, information blackout and the danger of a violent clamp-down, while noting both Trump’s strike options and Tehran’s counter-threats against U.S. troops and Israel. By giving roughly equal weight to U.S. rhetoric and Iranian warnings, these reports aim for balance but can create a ‘both-sides’ framing that may understate the power asymmetry and humanitarian stakes.