Technology & Science

Russia Begins Nationwide Throttling of Telegram to Push Users Toward State-Backed ‘Max’ App

Starting 10 Feb 2026, Russia’s Roskomnadzor activated network-level slowdowns on Telegram across the country and vowed to tighten them until the platform obeys Russian data-and-content rules.

Focusing Facts

  1. Downdetector logged over 11,000 Russian user complaints in 24 hours after throttling began on 10 Feb 2026.
  2. Telegram now faces administrative fines totaling 64 million rubles (≈ US$828,000) for eight cited law-violation cases.
  3. Before the crackdown, 73 % of Russians aged 13+—about 100 million people—used Telegram monthly, averaging 45 minutes per day (Mediascope, 2025 data).

Context

Moscow’s squeeze reprises its failed 2018 Telegram ban and echoes Iran’s 2016–18 blockade as well as the Soviet jamming of BBC and Voice of America short-wave broadcasts in the 1950s-80s—a cyclical pattern of information wall-building during military stress. Structurally, the move fits the 21st-century drift toward a ‘splinternet’ where large states—China since 2003, India intermittently since 2019, Russia since 2022—seek technological sovereignty by substituting domestically controlled super-apps (Max, WeChat) for foreign platforms. Whether effective or not, each tightening normalises deep-packet inspection and mandatory on-device apps, eroding the post-1990s ideal of a borderless web. On a century scale, such fragmentations signal a reversal of the early Internet’s unifying promise; if they harden, historians may mark 2024-2030 as the decade open networks fractured into competing techno-blocs, much as radio and telegraph systems balkanised before World War I. Yet Russia’s previous retreats—and the ubiquity of VPNs—suggest technical limits and domestic pushback could temper the blockade, making this episode another step, not the endpoint, in the long contest between state control and networked publics.

Perspectives

Russian government / official communications as relayed by domestic-friendly outlets

Russian government / official communications as relayed by domestic-friendly outletsPortrays the slowdown as a lawful measure needed to protect citizens from fraud, terrorism and data leaks until Telegram obeys Russian regulations. Leans on security justifications that conveniently expand Kremlin surveillance powers while glossing over free-speech concerns or the state’s commercial push for its own MAX app.

Western mainstream media

e.g., The New York Times, CNN, Bloomberg, EuronewsFrames the throttling of Telegram as another step in Moscow’s escalating internet clamp-down meant to herd Russians toward a state-controlled super-app and silence independent information during the war on Ukraine. Emphasises authoritarian motives and censorship, potentially under-representing any genuine public-safety arguments cited by Russian officials.

Independent Russian and exile outlets critical of the Kremlin

Meduza, The Moscow TimesWarn that restricting Telegram could backfire by crippling Russian military communications and the pro-war blogger ecosystem, highlighting internal disputes and the regime’s reliance on the very app it is attacking. Focuses on Kremlin missteps and self-inflicted harm, reflecting an oppositional stance that may magnify bureaucratic conflict to undermine official narratives.

Go Deeper on Perplexity

Get the full picture, every morning.

Multi-perspective news analysis delivered to your inbox—free. We read 1,000s of sources so you don't have to.

One-click sign up. No spam, ever.