Global & US Headlines

Russia’s RS-28 “Sarmat” Clears Second Flight Test, Regiment Deployment Slated for End-2026

A second successful launch of the liquid-fuel RS-28 Sarmat ICBM on 12 May 2026 removed a key technical hurdle and allowed President Putin to order the first Sarmat-equipped regiment into combat duty by year-end 2026, ending years of schedule slippage.

By Naia Okafor-Chen

Focusing Facts

  1. Test fired 12 May 2026 at 11:15 a.m. from Plesetsk Cosmodrome; commander Sergei Karakayev declared the mission “accomplished.”
  2. Putin approved placement of the first Sarmat regiment in the Uzhur formation, Krasnoyarsk Territory, with operational status targeted before 31 Dec 2026.
  3. Sarmat is quoted as having >35,000 km range and a throw-weight carrying 10–15 warheads—over four times the total yield of any existing Western ICBM.

Context

The fanfare evokes the 1974 rollout of the R-36M “SS-18 Satan,” which similarly rebalanced nuclear math by packing up to 10 MIRVs and prompted the 1979 SALT-II limits. Like then, today’s debut comes after the demise of a restraint regime—the US exit from the ABM Treaty in 2002, Russia’s suspension of New START inspections in 2023, and the INF Treaty’s death in 2019—rekindling the offense-versus-defense spiral that has defined strategic forces since the first R-7 Semyorka in 1957. Technically, Sarmat’s liquid fuel and sub-orbital path echo the Soviet Fractional Orbital Bombardment System tested in 1968, underscoring how old concepts resurface when treaties lapse. Strategically, one more multi-warhead missile does not alter assured-destruction logic, but it signals that Moscow is willing to spend scarce resources to preserve a superpower image—much as the USSR did in the late Brezhnev stagnation era. On a 100-year horizon, the more salient trend may be the steady erosion of verification mechanisms, coupled with emerging hypersonic and AI-driven C3 systems; whether Sarmat itself flies in 2126 is doubtful, but the precedent it sets—nuclear modernisation without arms-control guardrails—could shape the strategic landscape for decades, making future crises less predictable and escalation thresholds fuzzier.

Perspectives

Russian government and pro-Kremlin outlets

e.g., Kremlin transcripts, TASS, SputnikPortray the Sarmat launch as an unequivocal technological triumph that guarantees Russia can strike any point on Earth and restores strategic superiority over the West. Echo official talking points and patriotic rhetoric while ignoring the programme’s long delays and failures, serving Moscow’s interest in projecting strength.

Skeptical or adversarial press

Ukrainian, Western, and Indian mainstream outletsFrame the test as mostly political theatre, stressing the missile’s history of failed trials and asserting that it will not change the overall nuclear balance. May underplay genuine technical progress and highlight setbacks to reassure readers and undermine Russian deterrence claims.

Sensationalist or alarmist coverage

tabloids and hyperbolic foreign sitesPresents the Sarmat as an immediate doomsday threat to NATO capitals, claiming minutes-to-impact destruction and spreading talk of nuking England. Amplifies extreme language and worst-case scenarios to attract clicks and stoke public fear, often repeating Kremlin threats without critical scrutiny.

Like what you're reading?

Create a free account to read 5 articles every week. No credit card required.

Share

Related Stories