Global & US Headlines

Kyiv Green-Lights Deep Pre-Emptive Strikes; Kremlin Yanks Air Defenses Home

On 24-25 June 2026, President Zelenskyy publicly ordered Ukrainian intelligence and forces to hit Russian war-support sites inside Russia and Crimea ahead of any Russian buildup, prompting Moscow to redeploy large numbers of air-defense launchers to Moscow, Valdai and the Kerch Bridge.

By Underlines Team

Focusing Facts

  1. Ukrainian intel says “hundreds” of S-400/S-500/Pantsir launchers were transferred to the Moscow region and another ~90 to Valdai after the order.
  2. Recent Ukrainian attacks destroyed >6,000 t of ammunition near St. Petersburg and set ablaze the Orenburg Gas Processing Plant 1,200 km from the front line.
  3. Fuel shortages now reported in 60+ Russian regions after strikes that Kiev claims shut down about 30 % of Russia’s refinery capacity.

Context

Zelenskyy’s directive echoes the WWII Allied Oil Campaign of 1944, when hitting refineries strangled the Wehrmacht far from the front, and resembles the 1982 British ‘Black Buck’ raids showing that symbolic deep strikes can shape diplomacy more than battlefield lines. Long-range cheap drones and precision missiles—once monopolised by superpowers—are diffusing to embattled mid-sized states, shifting modern war toward economic infrastructure attrition and homeland vulnerability. Whether these Ukrainian raids compel talks or trigger harsher Russian escalation will ripple through future deterrence models: if a conventional military can repeatedly pierce a nuclear power’s rear area, traditional sanctuary assumptions erode. On a century scale this moment may mark the point when inexpensive autonomy and precision tilted the balance from massed fronts to systemic pressure on energy, logistics and public consent, a trend likely to outlast the Russo-Ukrainian war itself.

Perspectives

Ukrainian national media

Interfax-Ukraine, KyivPost, Euromaidan Press, Ukrainska PravdaFrame Zelenskyy’s order for pre-emptive long-range strikes as a carefully planned, successful campaign that is crippling Russia’s logistics and will force the Kremlin to sue for peace if Western partners supply the right weapons. Patriotic alignment with Kyiv means these outlets echo official talking points, trumpet battlefield successes and downplay risks of escalation or civilian harm, relying almost exclusively on Ukrainian intelligence claims that are hard to independently verify.

Turkish state-affiliated outlets

TRT World, Anadolu AjansıReport Zelenskyy’s call for pre-emptive strikes while stressing that he ‘claims’ Russia is shifting air defences and suffering fuel shortages, presenting the move as the latest twist in a protracted war rather than a decisive turning point. As Ankara tries to balance ties with both Kyiv and Moscow, coverage keeps an arm’s-length tone, repeatedly attributing facts to Zelenskyy and avoiding value judgements, which can play down Ukraine’s narrative of imminent victory and cast doubt on unverified Ukrainian assertions.

U.S. local papers carrying Associated Press copy

Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Odisha BytesHighlight overnight Ukrainian strikes deep inside Russia, civilian casualties on both sides and note that Zelenskyy has accepted an ‘unconditional’ cease-fire proposed by Donald Trump that Putin rejected, portraying an ongoing tit-for-tat war with stalled diplomacy. AP syndication aimed at a broad U.S. readership inserts domestic political angles—Trump’s cease-fire gambit—while equating Ukrainian and Russian strikes, which can create a false balance that blurs the aggressor–victim distinction central to Kyiv’s messaging.

Like what you're reading?

Create a free account to read 5 articles every week. No credit card required.

Share

Related Stories