Global & US Headlines
U.S. Shuts Erbil Air Base, Ending Operation Inherent Resolve in Iraq
On 30 Sept 2026 the final 1,500 U.S.-led coalition troops exited Erbil Air Base, formally terminating the 12-year anti-ISIS mission and handing all security duties to the Iraqi government.
Focusing Facts
- Departure completed on schedule set in the September 2024 U.S.–Iraq two-stage pact, removing the last 1,500 coalition personnel from Erbil on 30 Sept 2026.
- Baghdad proclaimed a new four-day national holiday, “Sovereignty Days” (30 Sept–3 Oct 2026), to mark the end of foreign military presence.
- U.S. auditors report $11.5 billion was enacted for Operation Inherent Resolve in FY 2024-25, with $9.5 billion already obligated.
Context
Great-power retrenchments rarely end neatly. Washington’s 2026 departure echoes its December 2011 pull-out—followed by a return when ISIS captured Mosul in June 2014—and even the far quicker collapse after the Soviet exit from Afghanistan in February 1989. Like Saigon 1973 or Kabul 2021, bell-ringing parades in Baghdad risk obscuring the question of who actually monopolises force once the foreign scaffold is gone. Long-term, the move fits a 20-year U.S. trend of shifting assets from the Middle East toward Asia, leaving regional balance to local actors and proxy networks. It accelerates Iraq’s century-old struggle (since the 1920 British Mandate) to assert sovereign control over oil, militias and borders while caught between stronger neighbours—now chiefly Iran. Whether 2026 marks lasting independence or merely the prelude to a third American return will hinge on Iraq’s ability over the next decade to integrate militias, police its airspace and prevent an ISIS 3.0. In a hundred-year lens, the episode may be remembered less for the American exit itself than for how effectively—or not—Iraq used the breathing space to build durable institutions amid an era of waning unipolarity.
Perspectives
Western security-hawk media
e.g., Yahoo News UK, The Hill — They frame the U.S. pull-out as dangerously premature, warning that Iran-backed militias and Islamic State could exploit the vacuum and that Washington may be forced back in. Reliance on U.S./U.K. military and diplomatic voices can push a narrative that justifies a continued Western footprint, playing up threats while giving limited weight to Iraqi sovereignty gains.
Iraqi nationalist and pro-resistance outlets
e.g., Middle East Eye, Iraqi News — They celebrate the withdrawal as a hard-won victory for Iraqi independence and urge Washington to pay reparations for years of occupation and damage. Anti-U.S. and sometimes pro-Iran rhetoric may gloss over lingering militia influence and downplay security risks from ISIS to keep the focus on American culpability.
Global South analytical press
e.g., Modern Ghana, The Times of India — They cast the moment as a strategic stress-test, comparing Iraq’s new responsibilities to Afghanistan’s post-exit turmoil and questioning whether Iraqi and Kurdish forces can fill the gap. Distant vantage and use of sweeping historical analogies risk overstating parallels and dramatising uncertainty to engage readers, without deep on-the-ground sourcing.
Like what you're reading?