Technology & Science
Russia Activates First Commercial 5G in 16 Cities on Military-Spared Spectrum
On 11 September 2026, Russia’s four nationwide carriers simultaneously switched on commercial 5G service in 16 cities—covering about 10 million residents—after six years of postponements.
Focusing Facts
- Operators received, free of charge, equal slices of the 4.63-4.99 GHz band because the military has retained the global 3.4-3.8 GHz 5G spectrum since Putin’s 2019 decision.
- Roughly one-quarter of Russian smartphone users with iPhones cannot connect, as Apple must enable firmware for the non-standard band and has not engaged with Moscow.
- From 1 Sept 2026 onward, new 5G base stations must be Russian-made; Western suppliers Nokia and Ericsson exited the market in 2022, forcing reliance on domestic or Chinese gear.
Context
Security services steering civilian tech is nothing new: in 1934 the Soviet Union’s People’s Commissariat of Communications centralised radio frequencies for ‘defence needs,’ slowing mass adoption—much like today’s FSB hold on mid-band 5G. The detour onto a bespoke 4.6-5 GHz band recalls China’s TD-SCDMA 3G experiment in 2008, which achieved sovereignty but limited handset compatibility. Long-term, Russia is reinforcing a century-old pattern of prioritising strategic control over global interoperability—from Gosplan’s telegraph monopoly in the 1920s to the 2019 “sovereign internet” law. If domestic equipment and isolated spectrum mature, Moscow could seed a self-reliant telecom ecosystem; if not, it risks repeating the fate of the Soviet ‘Sprint’ computer initiative (abandoned 1985) and drifting further from worldwide technology cycles over the next hundred years.
Perspectives
Russian state-aligned business wire services
e.g., Interfax — Present the 5G rollout as a successful nationwide technological leap that will speed up digital transformation, stressing rapid expansion to 50 more cities and affordable rates for users. Echoes official talking points and sidelines problems such as the military’s hold on key spectrum, sanctions-driven equipment gaps or wartime internet shutdowns, reflecting incentives to project government competence.
Independent Russian and expatriate outlets critical of the Kremlin
e.g., Meduza, The Moscow Times — Describe the launch as years late and severely constrained by security-service control of international 5G bands, Western sanctions that drove out Nokia/Ericsson, and the fact that iPhones still cannot connect. Focus on dysfunction and political interference highlights government failings and could underplay the immediate consumer benefits, aligning with an editorial stance that scrutinises Kremlin policy.
Ukrainian and Western media tying the story to the war
e.g., KyivPost, Yahoo! Finance/AFP — Frame the 5G switch-on within the context of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, noting drone-related mobile blackouts, sanctions, Apple’s market exit and Moscow’s deeper reliance on Chinese tech and military ties. Emphasises war-related negatives and Russia’s isolation, which may overshadow the technical achievement to reinforce a narrative of strategic weakness and aggression.
Like what you're reading?